Climate change: Why is the 26th World Conference

HomeLatest NewsIoT

Climate change: Why is the 26th World Conference

Climate change: Why is the 26th World Conference in Glasgow being called the 'last' hope of the world? Government representatives from around the worl

Important Points Before Applying For A Temporary Graduate Visa
Omicron: Where did the new strain of corona virus come from
Professional CV in MS Word- how to write it?
Spread the love

Climate change: Why is the 26th World Conference in Glasgow being called the ‘last’ hope of the world? Government representatives from around the world are currently in Glasgow, Scotland, to attend the 26th Conference of the Parties (COP). COP 26 aims to tackle the world’s environmental challenges, and Alok Sharma, the conference’s president, has said that COP 26 is the “last hope” of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. Scientists say that if we are to avoid the worst climate change, we must limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. World leaders agreed on this goal six years ago in Paris, and progress is now being reviewed, with more important announcements expected.

What more do we know about this conference and climate change?. Climate change is one of the most important issues in the world. If we are to stop global warming, governments must crack down on greenhouse gas emissions. The conference in Glasgow is an opportunity to announce changes. Possibly other polluting countries, including the United States and China, will make important promises here, while aid may also be announced for poor countries. It will make a difference in the lives of all of us. Decisions made here will affect our future jobs, how we keep our homes warm and cool, what we eat and how we travel.

How Dangerous Can Climate Change Be

The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) says severe weather, with extreme heat waves and devastating floods, is now commonplace. The State of Climate Report 2021 cites signs of climate change, including rising temperatures, severe weather conditions, rising sea levels and ocean conditions. It says the world is “changing before our eyes.” The 20-year average temperature since 2002 is about one degree Celsius warmer than before the start of the industrial age. In addition, the year 2021 has also seen the highest increase in global sea level.

Related: Carbon is sucked out of the atmosphere by direct air capture.

But why only one and a half degrees

It is generally known that human activities have affected the environment around the world. Greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, produced by our industrial development and burning fuel, trap heat in the Earth’s atmosphere, causing the world to heat up. Scientists say that by limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius compared to before the industrial age, we can avoid the worst environmental effects. But we have already crossed the 1.1 degree Celsius threshold, so urgent and effective action is needed. The agreement reached in Paris decided that the rise in temperature would be limited to “somewhere below” two degrees Celsius and efforts would be made to limit it to one and a half degrees. But the world is not on track to achieve that goal. Due to the current plans, we will cross the 1.5 degree Celsius limit in a few decades and this increase will reach 2.7 degree Celsius before the end of the century. Scientists say that if we still have to achieve the target of one and a half degrees Celsius, then there is no time for cheapness at all. Some other scientists believe that it is too late and that this goal will not be achieved.

One and a half degree, two degree and three degree hot world will be like

If you go out one day, you may not even notice a difference of half a degree Celsius in temperature, but it can have huge and potentially devastating effects on our global environment. As hot as the world was at the end of the 19th century, it is now 1.1 degrees Celsius warmer and its effects are being felt all over the world.

So what will happen in such a case

If global temperatures were limited to one and a half degrees Celsius by 2100 compared to pre-industrial times, polar ice caps and glaciers would continue to melt. But the benefit of limiting it to that level would be that we would be able to reduce the intensity of massive flooding and prevent millions of people from being displaced by rising sea levels. In addition, we will be able to reduce the number of people struggling for access to water worldwide by 50%. At two degrees Celsius, the world will become unbearable for many.

All the coral reefs in the warm seas will be destroyed and the floods will be worse than ever. Large numbers of animals and plants will lose their natural habitat and many others will experience more heat than one and a half degrees Celsius. Heat of three degrees and above will have a devastating and devastating effect on our planet, and hundreds of millions of people will lose their homes as sea levels rise. “We know our common planet is heading for turmoil and we can work together to solve this problem,” said Alok Sharma, president of COP 26 in Glasgow.

“We have to work immediately to come up with the desired solution. This work will start today. Either we will succeed together or we will fail together. However, this issue is not only scientific but also politically involved. Governments often do not formulate the policies that scientists believe are necessary to deal with climate change. Even former US President Donald Trump distanced his country from the Paris Agreement because he said it was “unfair”. However, President Joe Biden has included the United States back in the agreement. In addition, more action is expected from oil and gas producers and many countries that depend on this fuel.

Related: 12 beautiful places in the world

Problems facing poor countries

The developing and poor countries of the world lag far behind the developed countries and regions of the world in terms of carbon dioxide emissions, such as China, the United States, Russia and the European countries, but due to lack of resources Things are getting worse. In 2009, leaders of developed countries announced that they would provide 100 100 billion each year to help developing countries tackle climate change.

But that goal has yet to be achieved, and the British government, which is hosting the conference, says it is unlikely to be achieved by 2023. This is the biggest problem for many countries and the poorest countries are demanding some action in Glasgow.  He says the countries that are most responsible for climate change should pay the most to tackle it. “This is not a charity,” Malawi President Lazaros Chaqueira . Pay or end up with us. ‘ “It’s not a charity when we ask to keep our promise, it’s like paying a cleaning fee,” he said. “If you are involved in bringing our so-called home to this condition, let’s clean it up together, but you have to be responsible for it.”

‘Sometimes people have to get angry

“Sometimes you have to make people angry,” said Greta Tonberg, a young Swedish environmentalist, defending the blocking of roads by environmentalists. But he said it was important to make sure no one was harmed. Greta Tonberg stopped going to school in protest of climate change and her move has now become a regular campaign in many countries around the world. Get on the train to Greta Glasgow because trains are considered less harmful to the environment than airplanes. Greta arrived in Spain in a boat from the United States to participate in the 2019 Copa 25 and refused to fly.

Will Coupe 26 really save the world

Apparently, things are not looking so encouraging for a simple reason, and that is that the last 25 COP conferences have also failed to stop the emission of greenhouse gases that cause global warming. Despite three decades of negotiations, our planet is 1.1 degrees Celsius warmer than before the industrial age. But this year’s conference has more than usual expectations of real progress. This is also because the dangers have now reached the doorsteps of developed countries. Floods in Germany have killed 200 people this year, with one of the coldest countries having a heatwave in Canada and even the Siberian Arctic. And scientists have a clear position that if we are to avoid catastrophic temperatures, we need to halve carbon emissions by 2030.

Spread the love